Difference between revisions of "Talk:Case Studies"
From Free Pascal wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Too many references?) |
(Difference commercial<>non-commercial... why?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Otherwise this may look too much like a boring article and scare away would be users... | Otherwise this may look too much like a boring article and scare away would be users... | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks, | ||
| + | --[[User:BigChimp|BigChimp]] 06:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, I don't really see the relevance of dividing case studies into commercial and non-commercial. Both serve the purpose of providing examples where Laz/FPC use was an improvement. | ||
Thanks, | Thanks, | ||
--[[User:BigChimp|BigChimp]] 06:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC) | --[[User:BigChimp|BigChimp]] 06:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:48, 3 April 2013
Nice article (and great example of use of Laz/FPC), but it seems the references belong more to an academic article than a marketing case study unless they clearly indicated how spinathyr/simthyr are used. Even then, perhaps a selection of a couple of them might be better?
Otherwise this may look too much like a boring article and scare away would be users...
Thanks, --BigChimp 06:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Also, I don't really see the relevance of dividing case studies into commercial and non-commercial. Both serve the purpose of providing examples where Laz/FPC use was an improvement.
Thanks, --BigChimp 06:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
