Difference between revisions of "Talk:Case Studies"

From Free Pascal wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Difference commercial<>non-commercial... why?)
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Too many references? ==
 
Nice article (and great example of use of Laz/FPC), but it seems the references belong more to an academic article than a marketing case study unless they clearly indicated how spinathyr/simthyr are used. Even then, perhaps a selection of a couple of them might be better?
 
Nice article (and great example of use of Laz/FPC), but it seems the references belong more to an academic article than a marketing case study unless they clearly indicated how spinathyr/simthyr are used. Even then, perhaps a selection of a couple of them might be better?
  
Line 6: Line 7:
 
--[[User:BigChimp|BigChimp]] 06:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 
--[[User:BigChimp|BigChimp]] 06:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
  
 +
== Why not merge with marketing case studies ==
 
Also, I don't really see the relevance of dividing case studies into commercial and non-commercial. Both serve the purpose of providing examples where Laz/FPC use was an improvement.
 
Also, I don't really see the relevance of dividing case studies into commercial and non-commercial. Both serve the purpose of providing examples where Laz/FPC use was an improvement.
  
 
Thanks,
 
Thanks,
 
--[[User:BigChimp|BigChimp]] 06:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 
--[[User:BigChimp|BigChimp]] 06:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:50, 3 April 2013

Too many references?

Nice article (and great example of use of Laz/FPC), but it seems the references belong more to an academic article than a marketing case study unless they clearly indicated how spinathyr/simthyr are used. Even then, perhaps a selection of a couple of them might be better?

Otherwise this may look too much like a boring article and scare away would be users...

Thanks, --BigChimp 06:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Why not merge with marketing case studies

Also, I don't really see the relevance of dividing case studies into commercial and non-commercial. Both serve the purpose of providing examples where Laz/FPC use was an improvement.

Thanks, --BigChimp 06:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)