Difference between revisions of "Talk:Multiplatform Programming Guide"

From Free Pascal wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(example is wrong)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==see also==
+
==Data and resource files example code ==
 +
Remarks: needs Linux support; needs support for writable files under Windows NOT being stored under the application directory. Please adjust the code, thanks. --[[User:BigChimp|BigChimp]] 11:05, 4 April 2014 (CEST)
  
See also these [[doc:rtl/sysutils/ | SysUtils]] functions:
+
==Parts to be reviewed==
* [[doc:rtl/sysutils/getappconfigdir.html | GetAppConfigDir]]
+
A recent edit indicated some parts of this page are no longer relevant and need to be reviewed. The question is: which parts are those?
* [[doc:rtl/sysutils/getappconfigfile.html | GetAppConfigFile]]
+
--[[User:BigChimp|BigChimp]] 07:49, 11 March 2012 (CET)
[[User:Vincent|Vincent]] 21:52, 12 Dec 2005 (CET)
 
==Linux in Europe==
 
  For example, on Europe, if you're developing desktop software you may decide that it only makes sense to develop for Windows and OS X. OS X is the most popular Unix in the world and is surging on the desktop, whereas Linux has mostly stalled there.
 
Really?  Living in both Britain and Croatia I would say that Linux is far more important than  OS X. [[User:Dejvid|Dejvid]] 10:15, 10 May 2007 (CEST)
 
 
 
: Well, maybe the text needs to be rewritten. This is a polemic thema, so maybe a more generic text would be better. I'll try to improve it. --[[User:Sekelsenmat|Sekelsenmat]] 20:34, 14 May 2007 (CEST)
 
 
 
: OK, I re-read it, and the text really needs to be fully rewritten. --[[User:Sekelsenmat|Sekelsenmat]] 20:39, 14 May 2007 (CEST)
 

Latest revision as of 10:05, 4 April 2014

Data and resource files example code

Remarks: needs Linux support; needs support for writable files under Windows NOT being stored under the application directory. Please adjust the code, thanks. --BigChimp 11:05, 4 April 2014 (CEST)

Parts to be reviewed

A recent edit indicated some parts of this page are no longer relevant and need to be reviewed. The question is: which parts are those? --BigChimp 07:49, 11 March 2012 (CET)