Difference between revisions of "Talk:Multithreaded Application Tutorial"
Dieselnutjob (talk | contribs) (→fpgui) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I will be very grateful for a solution to my problem. | I will be very grateful for a solution to my problem. | ||
[[User:Xena|Xena]] 00:37, 16 February 2014 (CET) | [[User:Xena|Xena]] 00:37, 16 February 2014 (CET) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == fpgui == | ||
+ | |||
+ | I rewrote the example as an fpgui program (just for my own education). | ||
+ | I don't know whether this is useful to anyone else. | ||
+ | Anyway, find the example here | ||
+ | http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,24217.0.html : [[User:Dieselnutjob|dieselnutjob]] |
Revision as of 00:00, 13 April 2014
fpc_popaddrstack()
I want to use FPC to compile my WinApi multi-threaded application but after compilation and running I often receive SIGSEGV error. After debugging, the segmentation fault is ALWAYS in function "fpc_popaddrstack()".
The application uses hooks and CreateRemoteThread. Thus additional calls to "fpc_popaddrstack()" must not be made. The trick described in that article will not work properly. These calls shall be disabled.
I do not use "try-except" and "try-finally" blocks in my code and I don't need exception handling. My question is: How to supress the fpc_popaddrstack() or (better) all routines in unit "except.inc"? (any directive to disable it)
I will be very grateful for a solution to my problem. Xena 00:37, 16 February 2014 (CET)
fpgui
I rewrote the example as an fpgui program (just for my own education). I don't know whether this is useful to anyone else. Anyway, find the example here http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,24217.0.html : dieselnutjob