Difference between revisions of "User talk:BigChimp"
From Free Pascal wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:All the other pages use it as well, and IIRC the differences are that syntaxhihglight is better supported (IIRC, again) and it also allows other languages (SQL, bash etc).--[[User:BigChimp|BigChimp]] 08:51, 2 August 2014 (CEST) | :All the other pages use it as well, and IIRC the differences are that syntaxhihglight is better supported (IIRC, again) and it also allows other languages (SQL, bash etc).--[[User:BigChimp|BigChimp]] 08:51, 2 August 2014 (CEST) | ||
| + | :See also http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi#Alternative_.3Csource.3E_tag | ||
Revision as of 09:07, 2 August 2014
Old
TDBF Patches
Why do you think that patches for TDBF won't be accepted? Since there is no maintainer, bugs won't be fixed anymore by a fixed person, but patches can be accepted, if they have a minimal quality.Vincent 12:23, 19 March 2012 (CET)
That's what I remembered from the discussion on Mantis... glad to be proven wrong. Thanks for the heads up; I'll correct the page...--BigChimp 15:51, 19 March 2012 (CET)
Changing source to syntaxhighlight
Hi BigChimp, can you tell me, what is the reason of the change from "source" to "syntaxhighlight" in topic File Handling In Pascal? My browser shows it identical.
Thank you --Michl 23:28, 1 August 2014 (CEST)
- All the other pages use it as well, and IIRC the differences are that syntaxhihglight is better supported (IIRC, again) and it also allows other languages (SQL, bash etc).--BigChimp 08:51, 2 August 2014 (CEST)
- See also http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi#Alternative_.3Csource.3E_tag
