Difference between revisions of "User talk:Djzepi"

From Free Pascal wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Update)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== confusing ASCII with UTF ==
+
Hey there. Why did you create a <source lang="text">{{Binary}}</source> template instead of using the <source lang="text">{{Lazarus Documentation}}</source> template?
 +
---[[User:Trev|Trev]] ([[User talk:Trev|talk]])
 +
: The page templates are used for uniform categorization among languages. I mean, you could use [[Template:LanguageBar]] directly, but then you had to manually keep categorizations among localized pages in sync. I hate this approach, though, as it clutters the template namespace, there’s a very limited set of page that’ll eventually transclude a template (so semantically it isn’t a ''template''), and last but not least, MediaWiki (meanwhile) knows a language extension.
 +
---[[User:Kai Burghardt|Kai Burghardt]] ([[User talk:Kai Burghardt|talk]]) 15:37, 24 June 2019 (CEST)
  
Say, why are you inserting a statement certain characters were defined by [[UTF-8]] ([[Special:Diff/120680]] [[Special:Diff/120682]])? UTF is merely an ''encoding'', a certain way to store numbers (usually Unicode code points). It doesn't by any means define a character-number-tuple. And you know that, since you translated [[UTF-8/fi]]. [[User:Kai Burghardt|Kai Burghardt]] ([[User talk:Kai Burghardt|talk]]) 14:04, 31 October 2018 (CET)
+
So why invent a new template for every page when the <source lang="text">{{Lazarus Documentation}}</source> template appears to do the same job? That is, it adds the required language bar entries automatically.
 +
---[[User:Trev|Trev]] ([[User talk:Trev|talk]])
 +
: As I wrote yesterday, the page templates are used for categorization. There is one template for every article, that defines its categories. Otherwise every language version of an article had to be manually categorized.  
 +
---[[User:Kai Burghardt|Kai Burghardt]] ([[User talk:Kai Burghardt|talk]]) 12:51, 25 June 2019 (CEST)
  
== code cat breaks HTML ==
+
Ah, now I understand. I'm not so sure that manual categorisation is such a burden given most translated pages are copied en masse and then actually translated (from what I've observed). Anyway, thanks for the explanation.
 
+
---[[User:Trev|Trev]] ([[User talk:Trev|talk]])
Hi Djzepi,
 
 
 
* please don't [[Special:Diff/123796|insert]] HTML <syntaxhighlight lang="html4strict" enclose="none"><br/></syntaxhighlight>. They [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Line_breaks_usage do not really belong] into the MediaWiki context.
 
* You [[Special:Diff/123750|removed]] [[Special:Diff/123704|<syntaxhighlight enclose="none">Category:Code</syntaxhighlight>]] [[Special:Diff/123279|a lot]]. According to [[:Category:Code|its definition]], articles with this category contain “code examples”. Why have you removed it then if the examples are still present? It would not make sense in related translation templates, since the translations are never always in sync.
 
[[User:Kai Burghardt|Kai Burghardt]] ([[User talk:Kai Burghardt|talk]]) 18:48, 20 March 2019 (CET)
 

Latest revision as of 13:20, 25 June 2019

Hey there. Why did you create a

{{Binary}}

template instead of using the

{{Lazarus Documentation}}

template?

---Trev (talk)

The page templates are used for uniform categorization among languages. I mean, you could use Template:LanguageBar directly, but then you had to manually keep categorizations among localized pages in sync. I hate this approach, though, as it clutters the template namespace, there’s a very limited set of page that’ll eventually transclude a template (so semantically it isn’t a template), and last but not least, MediaWiki (meanwhile) knows a language extension.

---Kai Burghardt (talk) 15:37, 24 June 2019 (CEST)

So why invent a new template for every page when the

{{Lazarus Documentation}}

template appears to do the same job? That is, it adds the required language bar entries automatically.

---Trev (talk)

As I wrote yesterday, the page templates are used for categorization. There is one template for every article, that defines its categories. Otherwise every language version of an article had to be manually categorized.

---Kai Burghardt (talk) 12:51, 25 June 2019 (CEST)

Ah, now I understand. I'm not so sure that manual categorisation is such a burden given most translated pages are copied en masse and then actually translated (from what I've observed). Anyway, thanks for the explanation. ---Trev (talk)