Difference between revisions of "Talk:Read"

From Free Pascal wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Weird context)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
IMO that doesn;t make a lot of sense. <br>
 
IMO that doesn;t make a lot of sense. <br>
 
Also "Beware, it is necessary to check for end of file." That makes no sense to me in the context of the example program above, which clearly is only meant to read from input. --[[User:Bart|Bart]] ([[User talk:Bart|talk]]) 15:02, 25 May 2020 (CEST)
 
Also "Beware, it is necessary to check for end of file." That makes no sense to me in the context of the example program above, which clearly is only meant to read from input. --[[User:Bart|Bart]] ([[User talk:Bart|talk]]) 15:02, 25 May 2020 (CEST)
 +
 +
This sentence: "Nevertheless, if the convenient interpretation functionality is desired, without having a file open, the procedure system.readStr can be used to do so."<br>
 +
Also makes little sense in the context, quite apart from being difficult to parse. --[[User:Trev|Trev]] ([[User talk:Trev|talk]]) 03:29, 26 May 2020 (CEST)

Revision as of 03:29, 26 May 2020

This Note: Therefore the main application of read or readLn is non-interactive programs reading (generated) data files. IMO that doesn;t make a lot of sense.
Also "Beware, it is necessary to check for end of file." That makes no sense to me in the context of the example program above, which clearly is only meant to read from input. --Bart (talk) 15:02, 25 May 2020 (CEST)

This sentence: "Nevertheless, if the convenient interpretation functionality is desired, without having a file open, the procedure system.readStr can be used to do so."
Also makes little sense in the context, quite apart from being difficult to parse. --Trev (talk) 03:29, 26 May 2020 (CEST)